[manjaro-dev] [dirtyCOW] please update kernels ASAP
Jonathon Fernyhough
jonathon at manjaro.org
Sat Oct 22 22:41:16 CEST 2016
How many people use the RT kernels? Is it worth the effort supporting
three RT series in addition to all the 'normal' kernel series?
As I said in a previous post, we shouldn't be providing kernels that
aren't or can't be patched. If it's a choice between 1) a secure and
up-to-date kernel, and 2) meeting the needs of a niche group, we should
choose an up-to-date kernel.
On 22/10/16 21:35, Bernhard Landauer wrote:
> well with 4.8-rt unfortunately I have four more extramodules that won't
> build:
>
> ndiswrapper, nvidiabl, open-vm-tools and r8168
>
> Maybe it will be best for now to stick with 4.6 and apply the
> dirtyCOW-patch with that one. Or should we provide rt without those
> modules and tell people who need any of those modules to use rt-lts
> instead? Doesn't seem nice...
>
> What do you guys think?
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.manjaro.org/pipermail/manjaro-dev/attachments/20161022/daacf41b/attachment.pgp>
More information about the manjaro-dev
mailing list