[manjaro-dev] Static (non-rolling) option

[aaditya bagga]

Can it be called as a Manjaro-respin ;)
Manjaro-IB (Icebound Manjaro)!

maybe a monthly or 3-montly release cycle for it?
(I dont have much knowledge/experience on how long the release cycle
should be.)

On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 10:05:22 +1100
Rob McCathie <korrode at gmail.com> wrote:

> As described in the text file i linked, my vision includes web browser
> updates. (and LTS kernel updates)
> 
> If you guys aren't interested in having it within the Manjaro
> infastructure, do you have any problem with me using the Manjaro name
> for the project? Like I might call it "Manjaro-Icebound" or
> "Manjaro-Static"?
> 
> Also I am going to structure the repos in such a way that if it ever
> wants to be pulled into Manjaro infastructure it can be easily.
> 
> Regards,
> Rob / Korrode
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Ringo de Kroon
> <ringodekroon at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > LTs depends how you set :-) people like also some update, totaly
> > freez up is also a bad..firefox needs and some security stuf is
> > also needed.. once a twice a year would be bad..but mayby a system
> > that will be better testes from a Rolling distro and  and work with
> > little maintaince release and mayby 3 tiles a year a Point
> > release ..
> >
> > but but i think is better so look for how to improve testing
> > structure.. And mayby sometools where as developers can rely on
> > will also help in my idea..
> >
> > But keep if there something comes as an LTS release version is a
> > bad idea to set as  'manjaro' :) mayby such as Manjaro based thing?
> >
> > Most people comes to Manjaro because of Arch.