[manjaro-dev] Static (non-rolling) option

[Rob McCathie]

As described in the text file i linked, my vision includes web browser
updates. (and LTS kernel updates)

If you guys aren't interested in having it within the Manjaro
infastructure, do you have any problem with me using the Manjaro name for
the project? Like I might call it "Manjaro-Icebound" or "Manjaro-Static"?

Also I am going to structure the repos in such a way that if it ever wants
to be pulled into Manjaro infastructure it can be easily.

Regards,
Rob / Korrode


On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Ringo de Kroon <ringodekroon at gmail.com>
 wrote:

> LTs depends how you set :-) people like also some update, totaly freez up
> is also a bad..firefox needs and some security stuf is also needed.. once a
> twice a year would be bad..but mayby a system that will be better testes
> from a Rolling distro and  and work with little maintaince release and
> mayby 3 tiles a year a Point release ..
>
> but but i think is better so look for how to improve testing structure..
> And mayby sometools where as developers can rely on will also help in my
> idea..
>
> But keep if there something comes as an LTS release version is a bad idea
> to set as  'manjaro' :) mayby such as Manjaro based thing?
>
> Most people comes to Manjaro because of Arch.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.manjaro.org/pipermail/manjaro-dev/attachments/20131108/1347c1fe/attachment.html>