[manjaro-dev] Please add version information about Manjaro into /usr/lib/os-release

FH fh at manjaro.org
Sun May 10 16:09:41 CEST 2020


On 10.05.2020 15.47, Gerold Jens Wucherpfennig wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.05.20 um 21:36 schrieb Jonathon Fernyhough:
>> On 08/05/2020 19:57, Gerold Jens Wucherpfennig wrote:
>>> Please add 'VERSION',
>>> 'VERSION_ID' and 'VERSION_CODENAME'.
>>>
>>> The file is in the package "core/filesystem"
>>>
>>>
>>
>> What's the rationale for this?
>>
>> Once the distro is installed those tags have very little meaning to a
>> rolling release.
>>
>
> The data is already in /etc/lsb-release.
>
> $ cat /etc/lsb-release
> DISTRIB_ID=ManjaroLinux
> DISTRIB_RELEASE=20.0
> DISTRIB_CODENAME=Lysia
> DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Manjaro Linux"
>
> So why is this information in
> /etc/lsb-release?
>
> The developers of kinfocenter
> do not want to include this obsolete data
> and are asking for this data
> to be included, it has to be stored
> in /usr/lib/os-release.
>
> They do not want to change
> kinfocenter to include old LSB data.
>
> You say that version tags have very
> little meaning in a rolling release
> distribution like Manjaro.
>
> What do other people think about this?
>
> Sorry for bothering you,
> I just wanted to improve kinfocenter
> a bit on Manjaro.
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Gerold
>
> _______________________________________________
> manjaro-dev mailing list
> manjaro-dev at manjaro.org
> http://lists.manjaro.org/mailman/listinfo/manjaro-dev

The actual fields is described here

http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/os-release.5.html

The actual fields included in Manjaro is

 > ➜  lib cat os-release
 > NAME="Manjaro Linux"
 > ID=manjaro
 > ID_LIKE=arch
 > PRETTY_NAME="Manjaro Linux"
 > ANSI_COLOR="1;32"
 > HOME_URL="https://www.manjaro.org/"
 > SUPPORT_URL="https://www.manjaro.org/"
 > BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.manjaro.org/"
 > LOGO=manjarolinux

With relation the initial mail what fields are missing?

FH



More information about the manjaro-dev mailing list