[manjaro-dev] mesa issue

[Fanis]

I have encountered the same problem too.
:: lib32-mesa-libgl: requires lib32-mesa=10.0.1
:: mesa-libgl: requires mesa=10.0.1


On 01/13/2014 01:00 PM, manjaro-dev-request at manjaro.org wrote:
> Send manjaro-dev mailing list submissions to 
> manjaro-dev at manjaro.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit 
> http://lists.manjaro.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/manjaro-dev or, 
> via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to 
> manjaro-dev-request at manjaro.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at 
> manjaro-dev-owner at manjaro.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
> specific than "Re: Contents of manjaro-dev digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
> 1. mesa VS mesa-libgl in unstable (Rob McCathie) 2. Re: mesa VS 
> mesa-libgl in unstable (Ramon Buldo) 3. Re: mesa VS mesa-libgl in 
> unstable (Rob McCathie) 4. Re: mesa VS mesa-libgl in unstable (Rob
>  McCathie)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> 
Message: 1 Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:38:32 +1100 From: Rob
> McCathie <korrode at gmail.com> To: manjaro-dev at manjaro.org Subject: 
> [manjaro-dev] mesa VS mesa-libgl in unstable Message-ID: 
> <CAOunMDFKg+tC-mVEDzvW=vcXMiRBgkSY80Mk768ieV0AZ3mVSw at mail.gmail.com>
>
>
>
> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> Hi Phil,
> 
> http://forum.manjaro.org/index.php?topic=9956
> 
>> From what I can tell, mesa has been bumped to 10.0.2 from Arch 
>> in
> Unstable, but Manjaro's custom mesa-libgl packages haven't been 
> updated and explicitly depend on mesa=10.0.1, hence updating seems
>  to be broken.
> 
> Can another Unstable user confirm this?
> 
> Also, you could consider removing the explicit mesa version 
> requirement from mesa-libgl's dependencies, since the package is 
> just a symlink & license file anyway.
> 
> Regards, Rob.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2 Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 06:01:21 +0100 From: Ramon Buldo
>  <rbuldo at gmail.com> Cc: manjaro-dev at manjaro.org Subject: Re: 
> [manjaro-dev] mesa VS mesa-libgl in unstable Message-ID: 
> <CAGS0PzA9fSqku-c-E61G7QW1ax5YuGEe26XsExB0apka4=3pEA at mail.gmail.com>
>
>
>
> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> I can confirm this, exactly the same problem: lib32-mesa-libgl 
> requires lib32-mesa=10.0.1 mesa-libgl requires mesa=10.0.1
> 
> 2014/1/13 Rob McCathie <korrode at gmail.com>:
>> Hi Phil,
>> 
>> http://forum.manjaro.org/index.php?topic=9956
>> 
>> From what I can tell, mesa has been bumped to 10.0.2 from Arch
>> in Unstable, but Manjaro's custom mesa-libgl packages haven't
>> been updated and explicitly depend on mesa=10.0.1, hence updating
>>  seems to be broken.
>> 
>> Can another Unstable user confirm this?
>> 
>> Also, you could consider removing the explicit mesa version 
>> requirement from mesa-libgl's dependencies, since the package is
>>  just a symlink & license file anyway.
>> 
>> Regards, Rob. _______________________________________________ 
>> manjaro-dev mailing list manjaro-dev at manjaro.org 
>> http://lists.manjaro.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/manjaro-dev
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3 Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:09:25 +1100 From: Rob McCathie
> <korrode at gmail.com> To: manjaro-dev at manjaro.org Subject: Re:
> [manjaro-dev] mesa VS mesa-libgl in unstable Message-ID: 
> <CAOunMDERDyYo6nHyBt9qrRq7JoupNVkhsTTKZfcrGVLWWks4YQ at mail.gmail.com>
>
>
>
> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> Actually I take back the connect about getting rid of the explicit 
> dependency. Users being unable to update is better than users being
> unable to start X (in the case of a libGL.so version bump).
> 
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Rob McCathie <korrode at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>> 
>> http://forum.manjaro.org/index.php?topic=9956
>> 
>> From what I can tell, mesa has been bumped to 10.0.2 from Arch
>> in Unstable, but Manjaro's custom mesa-libgl packages haven't
>> been updated and explicitly depend on mesa=10.0.1, hence updating
>>  seems to be broken.
>> 
>> Can another Unstable user confirm this?
>> 
>> Also, you could consider removing the explicit mesa version 
>> requirement from mesa-libgl's dependencies, since the package is
>>  just a symlink & license file anyway.
>> 
>> Regards, Rob.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4 Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:11:45 +1100 From: Rob McCathie
> <korrode at gmail.com> To: manjaro-dev at manjaro.org Subject: Re:
> [manjaro-dev] mesa VS mesa-libgl in unstable Message-ID: 
> <CAOunMDGX0DOBbu17mGncf1tQOGTOA9MasQ=FLqLg7_HFrZY4BA at mail.gmail.com>
>
>
>
> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> comment*
> 
> and i suppose i mean start X with a compositing openGL Window 
> manager, not in general. Sorry I must need coffee :-D
> 
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Rob McCathie <korrode at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> Actually I take back the connect about getting rid of the 
>> explicit dependency. Users being unable to update is better than
>>  users being unable to start X (in the case of a libGL.so version
>>  bump).
>> 
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Rob McCathie <korrode at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Phil,
>>> 
>>> http://forum.manjaro.org/index.php?topic=9956
>>> 
>>> From what I can tell, mesa has been bumped to 10.0.2 from Arch
>>>  in Unstable, but Manjaro's custom mesa-libgl packages haven't
>>>  been updated and explicitly depend on mesa=10.0.1, hence 
>>> updating seems to be broken.
>>> 
>>> Can another Unstable user confirm this?
>>> 
>>> Also, you could consider removing the explicit mesa version 
>>> requirement from mesa-libgl's dependencies, since the package 
>>> is just a symlink & license file anyway.
>>> 
>>> Regards, Rob.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________ manjaro-dev mailing
> list manjaro-dev at manjaro.org 
> http://lists.manjaro.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/manjaro-dev
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of manjaro-dev Digest, Vol 6, Issue 12 
> ******************************************
>