[manjaro-dev] mesa VS mesa-libgl in unstable
korrode at gmail.com
Mon Jan 13 06:09:25 CET 2014
Actually I take back the connect about getting rid of the explicit
dependency. Users being unable to update is better than users being
unable to start X (in the case of a libGL.so version bump).
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Rob McCathie <korrode at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> From what I can tell, mesa has been bumped to 10.0.2 from Arch in
> Unstable, but Manjaro's custom mesa-libgl packages haven't been
> updated and explicitly depend on mesa=10.0.1, hence updating seems to
> be broken.
> Can another Unstable user confirm this?
> Also, you could consider removing the explicit mesa version
> requirement from mesa-libgl's dependencies, since the package is just
> a symlink & license file anyway.
More information about the manjaro-dev