<div dir="ltr">Seems really interesting, and this company exists since 2002.<div><br></div><div>What is available as</div><div>- ssh ?</div><div>- moving between accounts ?</div><div><div class="gmail_extra">- download counters, and stats ?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-04-15 12:00 GMT+02:00 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:manjaro-dev-request@manjaro.org" target="_blank">manjaro-dev-request@manjaro.org</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">Send manjaro-dev mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:manjaro-dev@manjaro.org" target="_blank">manjaro-dev@manjaro.org</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="http://lists.manjaro.org/mailman/listinfo/manjaro-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.manjaro.org/mailman/listinfo/manjaro-dev</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:manjaro-dev-request@manjaro.org" target="_blank">manjaro-dev-request@manjaro.org</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:manjaro-dev-owner@manjaro.org" target="_blank">manjaro-dev-owner@manjaro.org</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of manjaro-dev digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Fwd: OSDN Proposal for Manjaro Linux (Philip M?ller)<br>
2. Re: Fwd: OSDN Proposal for Manjaro Linux (Rob McCathie)<br>
3. Re: Fwd: OSDN Proposal for Manjaro Linux (kendell clark)<br>
4. a couple of issues I need help with (kendell clark)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 08:03:38 +0200<br>
From: Philip M?ller <<a href="mailto:philm@manjaro.org" target="_blank">philm@manjaro.org</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:manjaro-dev@manjaro.org" target="_blank">manjaro-dev@manjaro.org</a><br>
Subject: [manjaro-dev] Fwd: OSDN Proposal for Manjaro Linux<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:5710843A.30907@manjaro.org" target="_blank">5710843A.30907@manjaro.org</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8<br>
<br>
<br>
What do you guys think?<br>
<br>
-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------<br>
Betreff: OSDN Proposal for Manjaro Linux<br>
Datum: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:11:37 +0900<br>
Von: Shuji Sado <<a href="mailto:sado@osdn.jp" target="_blank">sado@osdn.jp</a>><br>
Organisation: OSDN<br>
An: Philip M?ller <<a href="mailto:philm@manjaro.org" target="_blank">philm@manjaro.org</a>>, <a href="mailto:support@manjaro.org" target="_blank">support@manjaro.org</a>, Roland<br>
Singer <<a href="mailto:roland.singer@desertbit.com" target="_blank">roland.singer@desertbit.com</a>><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Manjaro Linux?admin,<br>
<br>
$ wget<br>
<a href="http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/manjarolinux/release/16.06-pre2/xfce/manjaro-xfce-16.06-pre2-x86_64.iso" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/manjarolinux/release/16.06-pre2/xfce/manjaro-xfce-16.06-pre2-x86_64.iso</a><br>
<br>
First,action first before thinking too deeply, I would like you to try<br>
running the command above.<br>
Try several times to see the download speed and the logic that's behind<br>
how mirror is chosen.<br>
Was it good enough to meet your standard?<br>
<br>
FYI:<br>
<a href="https://sourceforge.net/settings/mirror_choices?projectname=manjarolinux&filename=release/16.06-pre2/xfce/manjaro-xfce-16.06-pre2-x86_64.iso" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://sourceforge.net/settings/mirror_choices?projectname=manjarolinux&filename=release/16.06-pre2/xfce/manjaro-xfce-16.06-pre2-x86_64.iso</a><br>
<br>
$ wget<br>
<a href="http://osdn.jp/dl/clonezilla/clonezilla-live-src-20160210-wily-amd64.ubuntu.tar" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://osdn.jp/dl/clonezilla/clonezilla-live-src-20160210-wily-amd64.ubuntu.tar</a><br>
<br>
Next, I would like you to try downloading the 0.8GB file which is released<br>
by Clonezilla who just very recently joined osdn.<br>
And after that, please give some time to think how different the<br>
download speed and the logic for choosing mirror are from the case with<br>
your release files.<br>
<br>
Regarding Manjaro Linux's recent release files on SF.net, most of them<br>
are not<br>
placed in North America and Asia. Also, SF.net is deprived of the<br>
ability to<br>
provide the logic to choose the optimum mirror for the users.<br>
<br>
In January of this year, SF.net was sold to a dishonest SEO company, and<br>
they<br>
have lost so much of the engineering resources.<br>
Also, since the website was sold, there are rampant SEO contents and<br>
malware on SF.net.<br>
Moreover, their mirror system is so disintegrated that it has reached a<br>
point<br>
where you can say it is broken-down.<br>
<br>
As to the link, <a href="http://manjaro.github.io/download/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://manjaro.github.io/download/</a>, which you show your<br>
users<br>
for downloading, upon visiting, users in North America and Asia will have to<br>
endure patiently for 8 to 24 hours of long time to download.<br>
When we contacted you a few months ago, the situation wasn?t so terrible,<br>
but I had expected the situation to get worse as it is now.<br>
Would you be interested in moving Manjaro Linux's iso releases on SF.net<br>
to OSDN?<br>
We can help you with the moving of the contents from SF.net.<br>
<br>
We just recently helped Clonezilla project move to OSDN.<br>
<a href="https://osdn.jp/projects/clonezilla/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://osdn.jp/projects/clonezilla/</a><br>
All release files of 200GB have been moved, and currently OSDN is processing<br>
download accesses for them from around the world.<br>
<br>
Here I listed the strong points of our current OSDN in comparison with<br>
SF.net.<br>
<br>
- OSDN's mirror network is more powerful than SF.net, especially in<br>
North America<br>
and Asia, we are way more powerful.<br>
- OSDN's ad space is more subtle than SF.net. At the same time,<br>
we eliminate malicious ads everyday.<br>
- We completely remove website Malware, and this is one of the things that<br>
make us different from SF.net.<br>
- We completely remove proprietary and pirated software from our website,<br>
where as SF.net is rampant with those kinds of software.<br>
- OSDN has a feature which enables entering project's Descriptions or<br>
Release Notes in several languages.<br>
- OSDN has a feature that enables to handle file release via API and<br>
Command Line Tool.<br>
<a href="https://osdn.jp/swagger-ui/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://osdn.jp/swagger-ui/</a><br>
<a href="https://osdn.jp/projects/osdn-codes/wiki/CommandLineInterface" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://osdn.jp/projects/osdn-codes/wiki/CommandLineInterface</a><br>
- Unlike SF.net, OSDN builds network based on global public oss mirror<br>
sites.<br>
It's not what we encourage, but we won't deny users from directly<br>
downloading<br>
from public mirrors instead of OSDN website.<br>
ex.<br>
<a href="http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/osdn/clonezilla/64911/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/osdn/clonezilla/64911/</a><br>
<a href="http://mirrors.gigenet.com/OSDN/clonezilla/64911/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mirrors.gigenet.com/OSDN/clonezilla/64911/</a><br>
<a href="http://ftp.jaist.ac.jp/pub/sourceforge.jp/clonezilla/64911/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://ftp.jaist.ac.jp/pub/sourceforge.jp/clonezilla/64911/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
We began a structure that returns a part of the revenue made from<br>
displaying ads<br>
during downloads via web. We call it DLShare, and it works by paying<br>
USD$100 per 150,000DL to the project side.<br>
It may not be a big sum of money, but it will serve as a steady means of<br>
earning an income.<br>
<br>
We can't tolerate to see great OSS projects get their reputations damaged by<br>
using SourceForge. There's nothing about us that is lesser than them,<br>
moreover<br>
there are some uniqueness in us that you won't see in them.<br>
Would you be interested in moving forward with us toward a good direction?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Shuji Sado<br>
President & CEO, OSDN K.K.<br>
<a href="mailto:sado@osdn.jp" target="_blank">sado@osdn.jp</a><br>
<a href="mailto:sado@opensource.jp" target="_blank">sado@opensource.jp</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 16:16:50 +1000<br>
From: Rob McCathie <<a href="mailto:korrode@gmail.com" target="_blank">korrode@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:manjaro-dev@manjaro.org" target="_blank">manjaro-dev@manjaro.org</a><br>
Subject: Re: [manjaro-dev] Fwd: OSDN Proposal for Manjaro Linux<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<CAOunMDHXwh2F8Lt2vgC73QFKd6hOdq=0iK4NBKM_akjmXs6o=<a href="mailto:Q@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank">Q@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8<br>
<br>
On the surface at least, it sounds good!<br>
<br>
Will do a little investigating of their service later/tomorrow.<br>
<br>
<br>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Philip M?ller <<a href="mailto:philm@manjaro.org" target="_blank">philm@manjaro.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> What do you guys think?<br>
><br>
> -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------<br>
> Betreff: OSDN Proposal for Manjaro Linux<br>
> Datum: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:11:37 +0900<br>
> Von: Shuji Sado <<a href="mailto:sado@osdn.jp" target="_blank">sado@osdn.jp</a>><br>
> Organisation: OSDN<br>
> An: Philip M?ller <<a href="mailto:philm@manjaro.org" target="_blank">philm@manjaro.org</a>>, <a href="mailto:support@manjaro.org" target="_blank">support@manjaro.org</a>, Roland<br>
> Singer <<a href="mailto:roland.singer@desertbit.com" target="_blank">roland.singer@desertbit.com</a>><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Manjaro Linux?admin,<br>
><br>
> $ wget<br>
> <a href="http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/manjarolinux/release/16.06-pre2/xfce/manjaro-xfce-16.06-pre2-x86_64.iso" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/manjarolinux/release/16.06-pre2/xfce/manjaro-xfce-16.06-pre2-x86_64.iso</a><br>
><br>
> First,action first before thinking too deeply, I would like you to try<br>
> running the command above.<br>
> Try several times to see the download speed and the logic that's behind<br>
> how mirror is chosen.<br>
> Was it good enough to meet your standard?<br>
><br>
> FYI:<br>
> <a href="https://sourceforge.net/settings/mirror_choices?projectname=manjarolinux&filename=release/16.06-pre2/xfce/manjaro-xfce-16.06-pre2-x86_64.iso" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://sourceforge.net/settings/mirror_choices?projectname=manjarolinux&filename=release/16.06-pre2/xfce/manjaro-xfce-16.06-pre2-x86_64.iso</a><br>
><br>
> $ wget<br>
> <a href="http://osdn.jp/dl/clonezilla/clonezilla-live-src-20160210-wily-amd64.ubuntu.tar" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://osdn.jp/dl/clonezilla/clonezilla-live-src-20160210-wily-amd64.ubuntu.tar</a><br>
><br>
> Next, I would like you to try downloading the 0.8GB file which is released<br>
> by Clonezilla who just very recently joined osdn.<br>
> And after that, please give some time to think how different the<br>
> download speed and the logic for choosing mirror are from the case with<br>
> your release files.<br>
><br>
> Regarding Manjaro Linux's recent release files on SF.net, most of them<br>
> are not<br>
> placed in North America and Asia. Also, SF.net is deprived of the<br>
> ability to<br>
> provide the logic to choose the optimum mirror for the users.<br>
><br>
> In January of this year, SF.net was sold to a dishonest SEO company, and<br>
> they<br>
> have lost so much of the engineering resources.<br>
> Also, since the website was sold, there are rampant SEO contents and<br>
> malware on SF.net.<br>
> Moreover, their mirror system is so disintegrated that it has reached a<br>
> point<br>
> where you can say it is broken-down.<br>
><br>
> As to the link, <a href="http://manjaro.github.io/download/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://manjaro.github.io/download/</a>, which you show your<br>
> users<br>
> for downloading, upon visiting, users in North America and Asia will have to<br>
> endure patiently for 8 to 24 hours of long time to download.<br>
> When we contacted you a few months ago, the situation wasn?t so terrible,<br>
> but I had expected the situation to get worse as it is now.<br>
> Would you be interested in moving Manjaro Linux's iso releases on SF.net<br>
> to OSDN?<br>
> We can help you with the moving of the contents from SF.net.<br>
><br>
> We just recently helped Clonezilla project move to OSDN.<br>
> <a href="https://osdn.jp/projects/clonezilla/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://osdn.jp/projects/clonezilla/</a><br>
> All release files of 200GB have been moved, and currently OSDN is processing<br>
> download accesses for them from around the world.<br>
><br>
> Here I listed the strong points of our current OSDN in comparison with<br>
> SF.net.<br>
><br>
> - OSDN's mirror network is more powerful than SF.net, especially in<br>
> North America<br>
> and Asia, we are way more powerful.<br>
> - OSDN's ad space is more subtle than SF.net. At the same time,<br>
> we eliminate malicious ads everyday.<br>
> - We completely remove website Malware, and this is one of the things that<br>
> make us different from SF.net.<br>
> - We completely remove proprietary and pirated software from our website,<br>
> where as SF.net is rampant with those kinds of software.<br>
> - OSDN has a feature which enables entering project's Descriptions or<br>
> Release Notes in several languages.<br>
> - OSDN has a feature that enables to handle file release via API and<br>
> Command Line Tool.<br>
> <a href="https://osdn.jp/swagger-ui/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://osdn.jp/swagger-ui/</a><br>
> <a href="https://osdn.jp/projects/osdn-codes/wiki/CommandLineInterface" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://osdn.jp/projects/osdn-codes/wiki/CommandLineInterface</a><br>
> - Unlike SF.net, OSDN builds network based on global public oss mirror<br>
> sites.<br>
> It's not what we encourage, but we won't deny users from directly<br>
> downloading<br>
> from public mirrors instead of OSDN website.<br>
> ex.<br>
> <a href="http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/osdn/clonezilla/64911/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/osdn/clonezilla/64911/</a><br>
> <a href="http://mirrors.gigenet.com/OSDN/clonezilla/64911/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mirrors.gigenet.com/OSDN/clonezilla/64911/</a><br>
> <a href="http://ftp.jaist.ac.jp/pub/sourceforge.jp/clonezilla/64911/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://ftp.jaist.ac.jp/pub/sourceforge.jp/clonezilla/64911/</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> We began a structure that returns a part of the revenue made from<br>
> displaying ads<br>
> during downloads via web. We call it DLShare, and it works by paying<br>
> USD$100 per 150,000DL to the project side.<br>
> It may not be a big sum of money, but it will serve as a steady means of<br>
> earning an income.<br>
><br>
> We can't tolerate to see great OSS projects get their reputations damaged by<br>
> using SourceForge. There's nothing about us that is lesser than them,<br>
> moreover<br>
> there are some uniqueness in us that you won't see in them.<br>
> Would you be interested in moving forward with us toward a good direction?<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ---<br>
> Shuji Sado<br>
> President & CEO, OSDN K.K.<br>
> <a href="mailto:sado@osdn.jp" target="_blank">sado@osdn.jp</a><br>
> <a href="mailto:sado@opensource.jp" target="_blank">sado@opensource.jp</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> manjaro-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:manjaro-dev@manjaro.org" target="_blank">manjaro-dev@manjaro.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.manjaro.org/mailman/listinfo/manjaro-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.manjaro.org/mailman/listinfo/manjaro-dev</a><br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 01:18:22 -0500<br>
From: kendell clark <<a href="mailto:coffeekingms@gmail.com" target="_blank">coffeekingms@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:manjaro-dev@manjaro.org" target="_blank">manjaro-dev@manjaro.org</a><br>
Subject: Re: [manjaro-dev] Fwd: OSDN Proposal for Manjaro Linux<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:571087AE.7000900@gmail.com" target="_blank">571087AE.7000900@gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8<br>
<br>
hi<br>
I can't comment on the malware accusation because I don't know one way<br>
or the other, but I have had lots of issues with sourceforge, to the<br>
point where i would desperately like to use anything else. But since<br>
we're part of manjaro now, I use what you guys use. I'm starting to get<br>
pointed questions from some of our new members. Things like most<br>
"serious" software programs don't use sourceforge, etc etc. I can't say<br>
whether that's true or not but I've had to delay iso images by weeks a<br>
few times, thankfully not recently, because sourceforge has been down in<br>
the past.<br>
Thanks<br>
Kendell Clark<br>
<br>
<br>
Philip M?ller wrote:<br>
> What do you guys think?<br>
><br>
> -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------<br>
> Betreff: OSDN Proposal for Manjaro Linux<br>
> Datum: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:11:37 +0900<br>
> Von: Shuji Sado <<a href="mailto:sado@osdn.jp" target="_blank">sado@osdn.jp</a>><br>
> Organisation: OSDN<br>
> An: Philip M?ller <<a href="mailto:philm@manjaro.org" target="_blank">philm@manjaro.org</a>>, <a href="mailto:support@manjaro.org" target="_blank">support@manjaro.org</a>, Roland<br>
> Singer <<a href="mailto:roland.singer@desertbit.com" target="_blank">roland.singer@desertbit.com</a>><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Manjaro Linux?admin,<br>
><br>
> $ wget<br>
> <a href="http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/manjarolinux/release/16.06-pre2/xfce/manjaro-xfce-16.06-pre2-x86_64.iso" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/manjarolinux/release/16.06-pre2/xfce/manjaro-xfce-16.06-pre2-x86_64.iso</a><br>
><br>
> First,action first before thinking too deeply, I would like you to try<br>
> running the command above.<br>
> Try several times to see the download speed and the logic that's behind<br>
> how mirror is chosen.<br>
> Was it good enough to meet your standard?<br>
><br>
> FYI:<br>
> <a href="https://sourceforge.net/settings/mirror_choices?projectname=manjarolinux&filename=release/16.06-pre2/xfce/manjaro-xfce-16.06-pre2-x86_64.iso" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://sourceforge.net/settings/mirror_choices?projectname=manjarolinux&filename=release/16.06-pre2/xfce/manjaro-xfce-16.06-pre2-x86_64.iso</a><br>
><br>
> $ wget<br>
> <a href="http://osdn.jp/dl/clonezilla/clonezilla-live-src-20160210-wily-amd64.ubuntu.tar" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://osdn.jp/dl/clonezilla/clonezilla-live-src-20160210-wily-amd64.ubuntu.tar</a><br>
><br>
> Next, I would like you to try downloading the 0.8GB file which is released<br>
> by Clonezilla who just very recently joined osdn.<br>
> And after that, please give some time to think how different the<br>
> download speed and the logic for choosing mirror are from the case with<br>
> your release files.<br>
><br>
> Regarding Manjaro Linux's recent release files on SF.net, most of them<br>
> are not<br>
> placed in North America and Asia. Also, SF.net is deprived of the<br>
> ability to<br>
> provide the logic to choose the optimum mirror for the users.<br>
><br>
> In January of this year, SF.net was sold to a dishonest SEO company, and<br>
> they<br>
> have lost so much of the engineering resources.<br>
> Also, since the website was sold, there are rampant SEO contents and<br>
> malware on SF.net.<br>
> Moreover, their mirror system is so disintegrated that it has reached a<br>
> point<br>
> where you can say it is broken-down.<br>
><br>
> As to the link, <a href="http://manjaro.github.io/download/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://manjaro.github.io/download/</a>, which you show your<br>
> users<br>
> for downloading, upon visiting, users in North America and Asia will have to<br>
> endure patiently for 8 to 24 hours of long time to download.<br>
> When we contacted you a few months ago, the situation wasn?t so terrible,<br>
> but I had expected the situation to get worse as it is now.<br>
> Would you be interested in moving Manjaro Linux's iso releases on SF.net<br>
> to OSDN?<br>
> We can help you with the moving of the contents from SF.net.<br>
><br>
> We just recently helped Clonezilla project move to OSDN.<br>
> <a href="https://osdn.jp/projects/clonezilla/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://osdn.jp/projects/clonezilla/</a><br>
> All release files of 200GB have been moved, and currently OSDN is processing<br>
> download accesses for them from around the world.<br>
><br>
> Here I listed the strong points of our current OSDN in comparison with<br>
> SF.net.<br>
><br>
> - OSDN's mirror network is more powerful than SF.net, especially in<br>
> North America<br>
> and Asia, we are way more powerful.<br>
> - OSDN's ad space is more subtle than SF.net. At the same time,<br>
> we eliminate malicious ads everyday.<br>
> - We completely remove website Malware, and this is one of the things that<br>
> make us different from SF.net.<br>
> - We completely remove proprietary and pirated software from our website,<br>
> where as SF.net is rampant with those kinds of software.<br>
> - OSDN has a feature which enables entering project's Descriptions or<br>
> Release Notes in several languages.<br>
> - OSDN has a feature that enables to handle file release via API and<br>
> Command Line Tool.<br>
> <a href="https://osdn.jp/swagger-ui/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://osdn.jp/swagger-ui/</a><br>
> <a href="https://osdn.jp/projects/osdn-codes/wiki/CommandLineInterface" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://osdn.jp/projects/osdn-codes/wiki/CommandLineInterface</a><br>
> - Unlike SF.net, OSDN builds network based on global public oss mirror<br>
> sites.<br>
> It's not what we encourage, but we won't deny users from directly<br>
> downloading<br>
> from public mirrors instead of OSDN website.<br>
> ex.<br>
> <a href="http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/osdn/clonezilla/64911/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/osdn/clonezilla/64911/</a><br>
> <a href="http://mirrors.gigenet.com/OSDN/clonezilla/64911/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mirrors.gigenet.com/OSDN/clonezilla/64911/</a><br>
> <a href="http://ftp.jaist.ac.jp/pub/sourceforge.jp/clonezilla/64911/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://ftp.jaist.ac.jp/pub/sourceforge.jp/clonezilla/64911/</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> We began a structure that returns a part of the revenue made from<br>
> displaying ads<br>
> during downloads via web. We call it DLShare, and it works by paying<br>
> USD$100 per 150,000DL to the project side.<br>
> It may not be a big sum of money, but it will serve as a steady means of<br>
> earning an income.<br>
><br>
> We can't tolerate to see great OSS projects get their reputations damaged by<br>
> using SourceForge. There's nothing about us that is lesser than them,<br>
> moreover<br>
> there are some uniqueness in us that you won't see in them.<br>
> Would you be interested in moving forward with us toward a good direction?<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ---<br>
> Shuji Sado<br>
> President & CEO, OSDN K.K.<br>
> <a href="mailto:sado@osdn.jp" target="_blank">sado@osdn.jp</a><br>
> <a href="mailto:sado@opensource.jp" target="_blank">sado@opensource.jp</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> manjaro-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:manjaro-dev@manjaro.org" target="_blank">manjaro-dev@manjaro.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.manjaro.org/mailman/listinfo/manjaro-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.manjaro.org/mailman/listinfo/manjaro-dev</a><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 4<br>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 01:29:26 -0500<br>
From: kendell clark <<a href="mailto:coffeekingms@gmail.com" target="_blank">coffeekingms@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:manjaro-dev@manjaro.org" target="_blank">manjaro-dev@manjaro.org</a><br>
Subject: [manjaro-dev] a couple of issues I need help with<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:57108A46.3090802@gmail.com" target="_blank">57108A46.3090802@gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8<br>
<br>
hi all<br>
I'm just about to release new sonar gnome images since gnome 3.20 has<br>
hit the repositories. However, I'm having a couple of issues I need help<br>
with. Our sonar gnome settings package might need to be updated. Our<br>
orca settings are not being used. Gnome also starts with accessibility<br>
turned off. I can of course easily enable it with alt+windows+s, but<br>
since sonar is an accessible distro it's supposed to come up talking.<br>
Would it be possible to add a shortcut to launch a terminal like exists<br>
in mate? If so, it should be bound to alt+control+t so that it's<br>
similar to mate. My last issue is hard to track down. With the release<br>
of gnome 3.20, our gnome image jumped from 1.8 gb to 2.0 gb in size, and<br>
the only thing I added was the tintin alteraeon sound pack, which, once<br>
an update is pushed out will only take up 265k on disk. I hope I don't<br>
sound like I'm complaining, I'm not at all. You guys do absolutely<br>
fantastic work and sonar would nto exist without you. I'm just bringing<br>
these up so they can get looked into, I've got some calamares bugs to<br>
track down and fix. I want to personally thank bernhard and phil mooler<br>
for their work on our gsettings stuff. You guys did some stuff that I<br>
didn't even know could be done and you've made sonar look much more<br>
professional as a result. We've changed how sonar is distributed. We<br>
start out with alpha builds, which is the stage we're currently in., We<br>
then move to beta after a couple of weeks. After a couple of more weeks<br>
we move into the final stage, with an rc or two if there are critical<br>
bugs, otherwise we move straight from beta to final release. I<br>
instituted this after a couple of embarrassing bugs I should've caught<br>
before release. That reminds me. The desktop icons don't seem to be<br>
renamed in our gnome image. Sorry, I completely forgot about that one.<br>
I'll check and see if copying the desktop items script into the desktop<br>
settings for gnome has any effect.<br>
Thanks<br>
Kendell Clark<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
manjaro-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:manjaro-dev@manjaro.org" target="_blank">manjaro-dev@manjaro.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.manjaro.org/mailman/listinfo/manjaro-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.manjaro.org/mailman/listinfo/manjaro-dev</a><br>
<br>
<br>
End of manjaro-dev Digest, Vol 25, Issue 15<br>
*******************************************<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>